2c12675ee1
- compile release notes since 0.6.1 - move 'Next Release' from 'Changelog' to a new section
34 lines
1.7 KiB
ReStructuredText
34 lines
1.7 KiB
ReStructuredText
.. include:: global.rst.inc
|
|
|
|
.. _future:
|
|
|
|
Future
|
|
======
|
|
|
|
This page contains some notes about future plans for zrepl.
|
|
Then again, Christian only has very limited time available for zrepl maintenance these days.
|
|
So, don't count on any of this happening in the near future.
|
|
|
|
One big development that has happened in recent years is this fork of zrepl: https://github.com/dsh2dsh/zrepl
|
|
We should figure out whether we can pull in features from there.
|
|
|
|
The next major step in terms of new feature development for zrepl would be to revise snapshot management:
|
|
|
|
- Make it easy to decouple snapshot management (snapshotting, pruning) from replication.
|
|
- Ability to include/exclude snapshots from replication.
|
|
This is useful for aforementioned decoupling, e.g., separate snapshot prefixes for local & remote replication.
|
|
Also, it makes explicit that by default, zrepl replicates all snapshots, and that
|
|
replication has no concept of "zrepl-created snapshots", which is a common misconception.
|
|
- Use of ``zfs snapshot`` comma syntax or channel programs to take snapshots of multiple
|
|
datasets atomically.
|
|
- Provide an alternative to the ``grid`` pruning policy.
|
|
Most likely something based on hourly/daily/weekly/monthly "trains" plus a count.
|
|
- Ability to prune at the granularity of the **group** of snapshots created at a given
|
|
time, as opposed to the individual snapshots within a dataset.
|
|
Maybe this will be addressed by the alternative to the ``grid`` pruning policy,
|
|
as it will likely be more predictable.
|
|
|
|
Those changes will likely come with some breakage in the config.
|
|
However, I want to avoid breaking **use cases** that are satisfied by the current design.
|
|
There will be beta/RC releases to give users a chance to evaluate.
|